Recently I found myself watching
the Ryan Reynolds/Amy Smart/Anna Faris rom-com, Just Friends. From the opening credits I realised there are better
films I could give my time to; I could delve into the Kurosawa box-set I just
bought, watch a classic Bogart movie, or even a different Ryan Reynolds movie (Buried, perhaps). Nevertheless, I still
sat there and watched the entire film. The experience was not unlike eating a
whole “Share Pack” of crisps to yourself – you enjoy the familiar flavours,
sometimes looking at the half-empty contents and debating whether you should
finish, but once you’re done you look at yourself with shame. Perhaps there
isn’t anything wrong with sitting down with a corny rom-com or a brainless
action flick but at the end of the day they wouldn’t have the categorisation of
“Guilty Pleasures” for a reason.
The term “guilty” and “pleasure”
are peculiarly paradoxical and looking at the phrase with scrutiny it’s a
wonder that you’d actively pursue something that would leave you feeling bad
about yourself. Despite this idea, many do switch on the TV, pop in a DVD or
head out to the local cinema to sit down and watch a film that has very little
worth. It’s understandable that not everyone wants to be educated by a film,
nor do we want a film that may challenge or upset us and so we ease into an
undemanding movie. Yet, with all this in mind, films like these are still made
with handfuls of studio’s money and are continuously profitable. What I want to
assess in this article are the pros and cons to this type of film.
Let’s begin with the pros:
Had a long week at work? You get
home and the last thing you want to be doing is mulling over the morality of a
prosecuted man in an epic French drama. So instead, you look over at your DVD
collection and choose Deuce Bigalow: MaleGigolo. It may not be deemed the best film ever but you chuckle occasionally
at the silly people being rude and outlandish. It’s also short, a mere hour and
twenty minutes of your time to provide some form of entertainment. You finish
watching it and it’s only eleven o’clock; that gives you time to watch another
if you want. You’ve watched the first, how about putting on the sequel? That’s
perhaps going too far but already you have an example of some of the benefits
of the guilty pleasure. In most cases the simple-minded comedies, romances, and
action or horror films are relatively short in their running time. After
cooking dinner, reading the paper and checking emails and Facebook, the evening
is drawing to a close and a long film is unfeasible in conjunction to getting a
good night’s rest.
Going to sleep also may not be
helped by a hard-hitting drama or tense thriller, so choosing those guilty
pleasures works against unrest. The stories of those types of films are also so
conventional with plots so foreseeable that you needn’t give them much thought.
Watching something like Friends withBenefits, knowing that the two people who remain “just friends” will
eventually get together, has an obvious narrative pay-off. As soon as Justin
Timberlake and Mila Kunis expectedly lock lips you sit back and watch the
credits roll, not needing to think anymore about that character coupling or the
events that have and could surround their relationship.
As you watch a film like this the
pure escapist ideology can also act as a “what if” for your own delusions. Look
how easily Adam Sandler got Brooklyn Decker in Go Just With It and Jennifer Aniston – if he can get
women like that maybe I can...and we’ll live happily ever after in Hawaii. The
same works for the other gender: Sandra Bullock may seem pushy in The Proposal but she’s loveable enough
by the end to win the heart of the charming Ryan Reynolds. No need to think of
ramifications of work-related relationships or the reality of ever meeting a
woman or guy like that in your everyday life; if it can happen on film it can
surely happen to you.
The cons:
This will never in a million
years be your life. Enjoy the display of bountiful romances and amusing
episodes as it’s mostly a fiction. You could pretend that these films reflect
certain aspects of life but they don’t. If you want a more typical romance
watch Blue Valentine. Not only does
it star Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams (two great bonuses to a film
experience) but it will never need the “guilty” preceding the “pleasure” to
describe it. It may not always be a joyous picture but it holds a different
mirror up to the subject of love and marriage – not like the rom-com convex and
concave amusement-park mirrors.
Perhaps it has become unoriginal
to draw inspiration from reality and if the guilty pleasures cavalcade are
anything to go by you can confide in that prediction. A typical 21st
action-film usually has a blend of sci-fi, horror or comedy -only one category
being anywhere close to the genre. Recently The Raid recalled the basic aesthetic of the action film, à la Bourne and Die Hard, a
million miles away from Transformers’
aliens or the clichéd evil corporation of G.I. Joe. The guilty pleasures are such because they clearly know how rife
with cliché, convention and monotony they are – but they also understand that
people flock to that. The writers never need to insert social-realism or a Ken Loach-like
introspection into human morale, all they need is a man/woman unlucky in love
or adept at saving the world and you have a film.
If you are someone who tries not
to embrace the guilty pleasure films it makes it all the more difficult when
you join the herd and tolerate one. There are many reasons why these types of
films get classed in such a way, the most paramount being the viewer usually
feels the most embittered with themselves after watching one. If you’re happy
seeing the same story rehashed time and time again carry on. But if you know
you shouldn’t be seeing them then check out the Empire Top 500 Films and live the
experience of classic Hollywood, acclaimed foreign films, interesting
documentaries, indie pieces or just some well-made silver screen studio gems. The
ultimate con of the guilty pleasure is making you believe you’re watching a
different film; you never are and it’s all a basic (if occasionally
entertaining) formula.
By Piers McCarthy. Also posted on Flickering Myth
No comments:
Post a Comment